In all the political chatter on Monday, no idea got a stronger negative reaction than the one from your humble e-scribbler that Paul Lane had secured himself a plum appointment in a future Liberal government, including a seat in cabinet.
For some reason, the idea of Minister Paul Lane just infuriated people.
Some said it was just not true.
Some said it was preposterous.
Others said that no one had made Lane any promises.
Let’s take a closer look at this.
Paul Lane scored big on Monday.
First, he secured his nomination and his seat in the next provincial election by running as a Liberal. As long as the party continues on its current track, Lane will win easy re-election not on his own merits but – as in 2011 – on the coat-tails of the party he was hooked up with at the time.
To be sure, Liberal leader Dwight Ball insisted Lane has no guarantee of a safe nomination, but in practical terms, that is a huge nose-puller. Incumbents are typically hard to unseat. Incumbents with a year and a half of profile before the nomination are that much hard to beat. And those with the enthusiastic and unqualified support of the party leader and the entire caucus likely could not be defeated with a crucifix, stake and a bathtub of Holy water. Paul Lane is safe.
And then . . . → Read More: The Sir Robert Bond Papers: Paul Lane: 2, Dwight Ball: 0 #nlpoli
You are embarrassed.
Someone ratted you out and made you look like bad.
You hid out for four days.
Not the smartest strategy ever, but hey.
You got pissy with people on Twitter and your performance on Here and Now was…well…vintage Paul Lane.Just remember:
Politicians have survived far worse scandals than a leak of a few text messages that show you and all your colleagues treat totally irrelevant online polls like they actually mattered.
Politicians have survived acting like far bigger jerks than you could ever be in your wildest dreams. They have
. . . → Read More: The Sir Robert Bond Papers: Some Free Advice for Paul Lane #nlpoli