A group of researchers from around the world have been discussing a plan for ‘open access’. Their goal is one that would remove barriers to obtaining educational materials online so that the worldwide community could benefit from shared research and knowledge.
Education is one of the many reasons that the pro-Internet community . . . → Read More: OpenMedia.ca: Geist: Setting the Stage for the Next Decade of Open Access
Just reading Tim Harper’s latest, hot off the internets: “Vic Toews and his quest for the bench.” This part jumped out: The Court of Appeal post is a federal appointment and Harper is believed to have told Toews that he would not appoint his minister directly to the bench.
Instead, he would be expected . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Benchquest: The what to do with Vic Toews saga rolls on
This news is a new low in the Harper government’s ongoing debasement of Parliament’s role in Canadian democracy: In the months leading up to the introduction Bill C-30, Canada’s telecom companies worked actively with government officials to identify key issues and to develop a secret industry-government collaborative forum on lawful access.
The working group . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Harper’s extra-Parliamentary internet surveillance committee
I was half joking in my post yesterday about the need for a #TellDaveEverything hashtag in the U.K. on the occasion of the U.K. Tories introducing their own intrusive internet surveillance legislation. Turns out, the fine citizens of the U.K. have got one up and going. Good for them! Hope Dave Cameron and the gang . . . → Read More: Impolitical: The #TellVicEverything sequel: #TellDaveEverything
There is a must read as context for the Canadian C-30 legislation that is pending, the lead from the New York Times today: “Police Tracking of Cellphones Raises Privacy Fears.” The American Civil Liberties Union has put together records from police departments across the U.S. showing widespread cellphone tracking that has become an ordinary thing: . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Routine cellphone tracking in the U.S.
“OPP Commissioner Chris Lewis and Information and Privacy Commissioner Ann Cavoukian debate whether the powers proposed in Bill C-30 are needed to battle cybercrime. More at: http://bit.ly/wvdZLb.”
This was the text of a motion passed in the House of Commons last night. The motion was brought by Liberals with a view to the coming debate at committee over C-30, the Conservatives’ proposed and invasive internet surveillance legislation: That the House recognize: (a) the fundamental right of all Canadians to the freedoms of . . . → Read More: Impolitical: A House of Commons marker laid down for the C-30 rewrite
Case closed: Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae says one of his staffers was responsible for a series of anonymous Internet attacks aimed at Public Safety Minister Vic Toews.
“I was advised yesterday that an employee of the Liberal research bureau in fact is responsible,” the chagrined Liberal leader told the House of Commons.
“I want . . . → Read More: Impolitical: The right thing to do
So reports the Globe late last night: “Ottawa hits pause on Web surveillance act.” The Harper government is temporarily parking controversial legislation that would grant new powers to authorities to police the Internet while it consults on how to rewrite it to assuage privacy concerns among Canadians and within caucus.
This report is mostly based . . . → Read More: Impolitical: A pause on the internet surveillance bill?
“The state has no business in the hard drives of the nation.” You go, Rick Mercer!
More on C-30 here. On the one hand, there was this presentation from a Vancouver police official yesterday: “People need to focus and keep their eye on the ball,” said Warren Lemcke, Vancouver’s deputy chief constable.
“We can’t monitor your e-mails. We can’t monitor your phone calls. We can’t monitor your surfing unless a judge . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Keeping an eye on the ball that is C-30
Well it’s a holiday of some kind in Ontario today, that Family Day thingy. Whatever you may be doing, have a good one. Here’s a bunch of reading material, for lack of better terminology, for your day off. Most of it is a break from Canadian politics.
1. This seems like a biggie: “Canada threatens . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Family Day drive-by blogging
There is a letter cross-posted at OpenMedia.ca that has been sent to the members of the conservative Free Dominion site. It’s essentially an appeal for the Conservative base to contact their MPs and encourage them to speak out against C-30. This online spying legislation is antithetical to core conservative principles of freedom, privacy rights, and . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Conservatives against online spying & other notes
Well now, he is the omniscient one: “Harper sensed cyber outrage was looming.” Prime Minister Stephen Harper had already made the decision to kick a controversial cyber crime bill to committee even before Opposition howled because he sensed a public backlash was rolling his way, QMI Agency has learned.
Harper sent the bill to the . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Hilarious spin
A quick post on the day’s events….in the wake of the tremendous backlash to the Conservative internet surveillance legislation, the Harper crew are making noises about amendments to C-30. See “Government willing to consider changes to online surveillance bill,” for example, where Conservative MPs Williamson, Anders and Tilson are cited as expressing concerns. Anders is . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Backtracking on #C30?
University of Ottawa professor Michael Geist has a really good summary and critique of the Tories’ new bid to give police “Lawful Access” to ISP data and to require ISPs to install snoopware. It’s fact-based and low-to-no hyperbole.
Opinion is lining up firmly against the Harper government’s internet surveillance legislation.
Harris: “Bill aimed at internet predators empowers Big Brother government.” The only thing that separates a democratic state from a police state is the notion of accountability. Police powers are restrained under the due process of our judicial system to reflect the protection . . . → Read More: Impolitical: El busto
This and that for your Tuesday reading.
– Mike de Souza’s report on the Cons’ attempts to hide both the oil industry’s involvement and its own lack of credibility is well worth a read in full. But let’s focus on a more basic revelation: Harper has set up a publicly-funded lobbying team to make sure . . . → Read More: Accidental Deliberations: Tuesday Morning Links
A Conservative minister stated this in the House of Commons: But when Liberal MP Francis Scarpaleggia attacked the Conservatives for “preparing to read Canadians’ emails and track their movements through cellphone signals” – which does appear to be a severe distortion of the bill’s powers – Mr. Toews’s counterattack was fierce.
“As technology evolves, many . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Disgraceful
Yes, plenty of key websites will be going dark today – and for good reason based on the U.S. legislation being protested.
But today also marks one month from the February 18 membership deadline in the NDP’s leadership race. So today may be a good time to sign up to elect the leader of Canada’s . . . → Read More: Accidental Deliberations: On constructive alternatives
This looks like a great event for those in Vancouver on January 12th: (Un)Lawful Access: Premiere & Panel Discussion. It’s a premiere of a mini-documentary on the Harper government’s coming lawful access legislation. Additionally, the BC Civil Liberties Association is releasing a report they’ve done on the proposed law. Here’s hoping that both will . . . → Read More: Impolitical: (Un)Lawful Access
In the wake of the Speaker’s privilege ruling yesterday, the Conservatives are saying that “there will be no more phone calls to voters in Cotler’s riding, spreading the word that he was about to step down.” Take that for whatever it’s worth from these Conservatives. Until they’re caught in the midst of the next wonderful . . . → Read More: Impolitical: Cotler incident may harm Conservative case for lawful access legislation